Senate Capital Investment Committee on 2/15/2024

Bills

Committee Members

Sen. Sandra Pappas

Senate, 65, DFL, sen.sandra.pappas@senate.mn, 651-296-1802

(Heard as: Sandy Pappas Pappas )

00:39:49,640
00:40:40,900
00:41:12,400
00:41:38,020
01:02:22,160
01:03:28,620
01:04:50,440
01:05:29,680

Sen. Susan Pha

Senate, 38, DFL, sen.susan.pha@senate.mn, 651-296-2556

(Heard as: Stephanie James )

00:39:24,820

Sen. Karin Housley

Senate, 33, R, sen.karin.housley@senate.mn, 651-296-4351

(Heard as: Karen Housley )

00:40:36,980
00:40:45,040

Sen. D. Scott Dibble

Senate, 61, DFL, sen.scott.dibble@senate.mn, 651-296-4191

(Heard as: Scott Dibble Dibble )

00:34:36,040
00:37:47,260
00:37:59,620
00:38:28,440

Sen. Nick Frentz

Senate, 18, DFL, sen.nick.frentz@senate.mn, 651-296-6153

(Heard as: Nick Frentz Frentz )

00:42:02,980
00:58:30,000
00:59:15,640
00:59:47,820

Sen. John Jasinski

Senate, 19, R, sen.john.jasinski@senate.mn, 651-296-0284

(Heard as: Jason Jasinski John Jasinski )

00:08:00,640
00:23:37,700
00:37:36,560
00:39:31,880
00:39:35,000

Sen. Zaynab Mohamed

Senate, 63, DFL, sen.zaynab.mohamed@senate.mn, 651-296-4274

Sen. Carla Nelson

Senate, 24, R, sen.carla.nelson@senate.mn, 651-296-4848

(Heard as: Nelson Carla Nelson )

00:35:25,600
00:41:31,980
00:54:09,960
00:55:54,500
00:56:29,200
00:57:08,460
01:15:02,020
01:15:41,780
01:15:59,760
01:37:05,540
01:38:05,660

Sen. Eric Pratt

Senate, 54, R, sen.eric.pratt@senate.mn, 651-296-4123

(Heard as: Pratt Eric Pratt )

00:42:35,920
01:01:24,420
01:02:22,160
01:03:08,380
01:03:28,620
01:04:27,400
01:04:50,440

Sen. Jordan Rasmusson

Senate, 9, R, sen.jordan.rasmusson@senate.mn, 651-296-4875

(Heard as: Jordan Rasmussen Rasmussen )

00:43:09,240
01:12:38,340
01:13:09,620
01:14:19,900
01:15:04,760
01:21:01,680
01:21:15,220
01:21:48,640
01:23:21,940

Sen. Tou Xiong

Senate, 44, DFL, sen.tou.xiong@senate.mn, 651-296-6820

Noteworthy Content:

00:29:13,020 - is intersecting those quality of life user impacts with their asset management work and projections of climate change to make more resilient systems.

00:46:03,540 - creating a structural imbalance that depletes the bottom line.

00:46:07,440 - On top of the structural imbalance,

00:49:20,320 - you get a projected structural imbalance of just over $2.3 billion.

00:49:49,860 - That view is what we call our structural balance.

00:50:24,120 - Then looking at the structural balance in FY26 and 27,

00:50:50,900 - The $2.3 billion in higher spending compared to our revenues in the out years means that we've got an ongoing structural imbalance.

00:51:25,920 - the underlying structural imbalance is something that we need to continue to monitor and be mindful of as we're making budget decisions during this legislative session and beyond.

01:00:26,120 - So the 1.4 billion dollars in a structural imbalance is simply based on the fact that we are spending more than we are taking in.