Senate Judiciary and Public Safety Committee on 3/22/2024

Bills

Committee Members

Sen. Ron Latz

Senate, 46, DFL, sen.ron.latz@senate.mn, 651-297-8065

(Heard as: Ratz Latz )

00:29:56,580
00:33:40,920
00:57:00,900
01:17:55,540
02:06:48,620

Sen. Clare Oumou Verbeten

Senate, 66, DFL, sen.clare.oumouverbeten@senate.mn, 651-296-8866

Sen. Warren Limmer

Senate, 37, R, sen.warren.limmer@senate.mn, 651-296-2159

(Heard as: limmer lemmer Limmer senator limmer senator lemmer )

00:23:13,020
00:45:15,460
00:46:50,600
01:45:09,780
01:45:34,980
01:45:46,240
01:47:05,600
01:48:23,020
01:48:34,580
01:48:51,460
01:50:15,100
01:52:05,620
01:53:53,660
01:54:27,100
01:54:27,980
01:55:12,300
01:56:02,020
01:57:18,820
01:57:54,540
02:21:42,680
02:38:31,080

Sen. Jim Carlson

Senate, 52, DFL, sen.jim.carlson@senate.mn, 651-297-8073

(Heard as: crawson Carlson carlson Caron )

00:36:30,880
00:37:07,100
00:37:57,900
00:40:33,160
02:20:29,600
03:27:19,460
03:27:42,560
03:28:13,900
03:28:37,760
03:28:54,880

Sen. Justin Eichorn

Senate, 6, R, sen.justin.eichorn@senate.mn, 651-296-7079

Sen. Jeff Howe

Senate, 13, R, sen.jeff.howe@senate.mn, 651-296-2084

(Heard as: Howe )

01:14:35,820
01:15:20,660
01:15:43,960
01:46:08,160

Sen. Michael Kreun

Senate, 32, R, sen.michael.kreun@senate.mn, 651-296-1282

Sen. Sandra Pappas

Senate, 65, DFL, sen.sandra.pappas@senate.mn, 651-296-1802

(Heard as: Pappas Papas pappas )

01:00:45,840
01:04:34,480
01:06:03,380
01:13:16,820
01:13:30,560
01:14:28,960
01:15:58,400
01:30:51,620
01:32:14,660
01:44:05,780
01:48:49,080
01:59:22,420
02:34:24,500

Sen. Judy Seeberger

Senate, 41, DFL, sen.judy.seeberger@senate.mn, 651-297-8060

(Heard as: seaburger )

03:26:08,160

Sen. Bonnie Westlin

Senate, 42, DFL, sen.bonnie.westlin@senate.mn, 651-296-8869

(Heard as: Westland )

01:00:05,880

Noteworthy Content:

00:59:02,660 - their identity kept confidential after an investigation

01:42:30,760 - Children are already facing significant mental health struggles and identity craving.

02:45:53,800 - The other portion of this is the change to attorney client privilege that is specific to the loophole I found in my community.

02:47:17,540 - The school board attorney literally called the city attorney and said it is very strict to use attorney client privilege and what it has to be is there has to be an actual lawsuit and you have to be discussing things like defense strategy things of that nature actually attorney stuff

02:47:53,940 - attorney client privilege the city proceeded had it in private not just to discuss that issue

02:51:41,120 - of that privilege which is a very very old concept there's evidence of it existing perhaps in ancient rome

02:58:54,960 - actually falls within the scope of the privilege or whether it should be turned over.

03:00:03,140 - practices act if such privilege data or private data is leaked

03:03:36,020 - I believe this would be an attorney client privilege meeting for whatever reason lawsuit pending no lawsuit

03:17:21,200 - but I' m also very protective of the attorney client privilege and having been

03:20:06,380 - because normally when a judge is reviewing attorney client privilege communications it' s in an evidentiary standpoint

03:21:27,260 - and to just follow along and go along with okay attorney client privilege and start taking votes and doing other things I think we should hold our own court and I think we should be able to do that.

03:22:35,000 - there was a portion that was not attorney client privilege and if the judge had started doing other things and other business

03:24:02,720 - client privilege purposes however I understand that a judge could

03:24:28,000 - going to be able to make a decision that wasn' t attorney client privilege or that a portion of it was an attorney client privilege is that

03:25:03,900 - for attorney client privilege when that was not really the case